- Would you watch this movie again?
- Did you connect with the movie on a personal level?
- Did you feel the emotional impact that you think the film intended?
- Do you think the movie satisfies what you consider to be the goals of cinema?
- Do you think it satisfies what you consider to be the goals of art?
- Do you think the movie's artistic intent is interesting?
- Do you think those intentions are well executed?
- Do you agree with the theme or moral you feel the film tries to convey?
For the mathematically inclined, each question can be though of as a binary digit. For the computer inclined, each question can be thought of as a bit. Arrange the digits/bits in order, with the first question being the most significant, and it produces a number between 0 and decimal 255. Congratulations! That's your rating.
For the rest of you, think this way: a no gives no points, and a yes gives some points. Each question gives twice as many points as the one below it, and question 8 (the last one) gives one point. For those of you who still can't be bothered to do the math, question 7 gives 2 points, 6 gives 4, 5 gives 8, 4 gives 16, the third gives 32, the second gives 64, and the first question gives 128 points. Add all these together, and you have a rating.
This is the same way that you grade System 1. The difference between Systems 1 and 2 is a few questions: I collapsed the last four questions of System 1 into two questions, and added two new questions in the second and last spots, respectively.
On to the good stuff: the Coen brothers rundown. To recap, basically as a way to "calibrate" a System, I review all of the Coen brothers' movies I've seen more than once. I chose only movies I've seen multiple times to more fairly evaluate them, I chose to stick with a single director's work because it's much easier to subjectively compare two films if they share the vision of a common director, and I chose the Coen brothers because I've seen more movies by them than anyone else.
- Blood Simple: 255, or 11111111
- Raising Arizona: 155, or 10011011
- Miller's Crossing: 255, or 11111111
- Barton Fink: 255, or 11111111
- The Big Lebowski: 255, or 11111111
- No Country for Old Men: 255, or 11111111
- A Serious Man: 255, or 11111111
- True Grit: 137, or 10001001
Since I've only reviewed three movies thus far, I shall re-review those films in a later post, addressing only the changes from System 1 to System 2, in order to produce System 2 ratings for them and see how they stack up. This new system will not replace System 1. Since the questions themselves are nearly identical, I will continue to answer them all and provide ratings for both systems. However, I instinctively feel that this system is an improvement over System 1, and I intend to see which one produces results I feel most accurately reflect my opinions. I may phase System 1 out at a later date, or I may decide System 1 was right all along and remove System 2.
Readers, please comment! And rate movies. Leah, do more than say "I haven't seen any Coen brothers movies" because I know you have.
While virtually any recreation may be played for money, and any recreation sometimes played for money can also be|may additionally be|can be} played only for enjoyable, some video games are generally supplied in a on line casino setting. An interesting question is what happens when the person trying to make recovery is the gambler's partner, and the cash or property lost was either the partner's, or was neighborhood property. This was a minor plot level in a Perry Mason novel, The Case of the Singing Skirt, and it cites an precise case Novo v. Hotel Del Rio. Pro basketball acquired essentially the most consideration from bettors during the interval from January by way of September, garnering 23.6% of all bets. 1xbet It was adopted by baseball at 14.1%, tennis at 12.7% and football at 10.9%. Parlay bets accounted for 20% of complete wagering, according to the lottery board report.ReplyDelete